Imminent FulfillmentImmortality,  Safety, Empowerment, Equality, KnowledgeUnity, Society

Intelligent, reasonable men of good will SHOULD be able to agree on things that matter.

"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to
  one who is striking at the root."
- Henry David Thoreau
Site Sections, Subject List, Reading Sequence, and Article Synopses

Introduction Material
Introduction Articles
Word Definitions
Human Condition

Christianity Material
Bible/Canon Issues
Christendom Analyzed

Jesus Material
Jesus' Teachings
Aspects of Jesus
5 Gospels Canon

Philosophy Material
Paradigm Material
Philosophical Issues
Psychological Issues
Sociological Material
Theological Issues

Cosmology, Creation,
Geophysical Material

Cosmology Material
Creation Issues
Geophysical Material

Reconstruction &
Mythology Material
Chronology Revision
Misc Ancient Myth Material
Modern Mythology Material
Psycho-Catastrophe Articles
Saturn-Jupiter Material
Symbol Development
Venus-Mars Material
1994 Velikovsky Symposium

Miscellaneous Material
Book Critiques Links
Misc Biology Links
Misc Issues/Conclusions
Poetry & Fun Material
PDF Download Files
Lecture & Video Links
Spiritual Products online store

The single greatest spiritual asset a man can have for successful living is the ability
to discern what is true from what is not.
- Michael Armstrong and Stuart Talbott

Archeology, History Concerning Jesus
Updated: 02/12/2020

Archeology, Ancient History and Mythology

What percentage of all the archeology of the ancient world has been done that theoretically could be done? By the most generous estimates based on practicality, less than 10%. Given that a fair amount of ancient ruins are buried too deeply or are under water, given that archeologists generally just cut trenches or cross sections through a site, given that religious, political and cultural factors preclude a fair amount of archeology done by responsible professionals, the less practical answer is very much lower.

What percentage of all the written material of the ancient world has been translated that theoretically could be done? Pick a small number! A better question would be: What percentage of the total material has been translated more or less correctly? Pick a much smaller number.

In terms of ancient history, serious problems with chronology, understanding the geophysical context  and the cultural mindset of the time, plague the whole enterprise of determining history from myth.

What percentage of all the mythology of the ancient world has been assayed that theoretically could be properly translated and interpreted into its intended meaning? Pick a very small number.

Thus as time goes on, we can rightfully expect more material in these realms to shed light on the historicity and activity of Jesus.

The Gospel Setting

In terms of places and major political figures, the general outlines of the Gospel setting have been corroborated to a remarkable degree, because around 90% of the archeological discoveries in the New Testament territory affirm the accounts. The balance of the discoveries do NOT DISCONFIRM. Two examples will serve to give the idea. In 1962 a sculpted stone was found at the ancient waterfront theater in Caesarea with a two inch clear inscription in Latin reporting that the governor Pontius Pilate was endowing the theater to the people of Caesarea in honor of the emperor Tiberias. In 1990 the bones of Caiaphas the High Priest were found in a 1st century burial site enclosed in an ornate ossuary. In addition see: Brother? James Ossuary

As to the Old Testament and New Testament geography of places–towns, cities, etc.–93%  of the sites have been confirmed. Coinage and inscriptions also support the physical existence. This background of geographical places in the Testaments being correct is what one would expect for the story settings. In the Old Testament it is the numbers and "allegorical stories" taken for literal history that flunk archeology, not the geography of sites and names. See: Bible Flunks Archaeology

Historical References to Jesus

For decades I was told that we had only two secular or extra-Christian historical references to Jesus. Paul Maier, professor emeritus of Iowa State College, assures us that we now have a dozen such references, five of them considered major with sterling credibility. As time goes on and research goes further, more such references will be exposed. Isn't this just what you would expect concerning a controversial man that was widely known in the day for only a couple of years, one who left only a misunderstood spiritual legacy, but not one who ever built any tangible structures, nor held any political or religious office that would be recorded in the historical record.

See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAN3kQHTKWI


Dr. Daniel Wallace - Corrupted NT issue:


"The more I studied the manuscript tradition of the New Testament, the more I realized just how radically the text had been altered over the years at the hands of the scribes....It would be ...wrong to say–as people sometimes do–that the changes in our text have no real bearing on what the texts mean or on the theological conclusions that  one draws from them..." - Bart Ehrman, Misquoting Jesus, p. 207-208

Professor Wallace shows us that this sentiment by Ehrman is unjustified.

These are the four questions that professor Wallace raises and answers:

1. How many textual variants are there?

Considering there are over 138,000 words in the NT, there are more textual variants (500,000 not counting capitalization or punctuation) than words in just the Greek manuscripts.

2. What kinds of textual variations are there?

These include misspellings, words left out, Greek words in different order, some additional text, some word substitutions, etc. These are all considered to be expected and trivial

3. What theological beliefs depend on textually suspect passages?

About 0.2% TVs are somewhat meaningful, and virtually none are significant.

4. Has the essence of the Christian faith been corrupted by the scribes?

Almost certainly not!

Pertinent information:

We have about 5500 Greek manuscripts, 10,000 Latin, 5-10,000 in a dozen other languages

www.CSNTM.org is the source for digital and graphic NT manuscripts.

A comparison to other ancient manuscripts of the same era and region:

About 1000 times as much NT sources versus classical authors, and dating to about 1000 years earlier

Just to be clear about something important: Translation and textual variant issues are NOT the same thing at all, and have almost no impact on each other.


Home   Site Sections   Article Map   Contact   Store   Contributions   Survey