IF I SEEK US

Imminent FulfillmentImmortality,  Safety, Empowerment, Equality, KnowledgeUnity, Society

"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to
  one who is striking at the root."
- Henry David Thoreau
Site Sections, Subject List, Reading Sequence, and Article Synopses

Miscellaneous Articles

Can We Agree on these?
Critical Issues
Unity Agreement Outline
Valid vs feaux intellectuals
Some Atheist Questions
What is a Prophet?
Cult Assessment Criteria
The Brothers Karamazov
Critique of A New Earth
Buddhist Violence
Some Pertinent Parables
Euhemerism & Catastrophe
Ancient Scholastics
Thoughts on Meditation
Kahlil Gibran on Law
The Great Pyramid
Brother? James Ossuary
Model for Visions & Dreams
Modern Echoes-Catastrophe
The Bergamo Experience
In Search of Moses
Personal Experience
Why I'm not Christian
Importance of Catastrophism
Ancient Explosion Reports
How the World Will End
Unity Church Letter
Reactionary Feminism
Some Conclusions
Woodhenge
Pensée Journal Issues
Video-lecture links

“I’m deeply disappointed in my species...Think of how stupid the average
person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.”
- George Carlin

The Bergamo Protest
by Michael Armstrong
07/18/2018

The idea that Saturn was an early sun for the earth and its inhabitants was introduced somewhat effectively in modern times by Immanuel Velikovsky, and fairly quickly endorsed and supported by other scholars. But most scholars and scientists just trashed it with undisguised disdain and rancor.

Given the stupendous questions that lack sufficient answers, given how truly ignorant we are, given the enormous amount of evidence surrounding Saturn in ancient times and our own, why not keep an open mind and hold off on preclusive or negative criticism? Why not stop short of trashing something huge like this paradigm change and give it some time? Why not just humbly enumerate aspects of it that are thought to be incompatible with current knowledge, aspects that aren’t adequately understood, etc., instead of denouncing it as infeasible and indefensible? But no: those adorable dogmatic defenders of the faith cannot do this with any serious challenge.

I remember my experience of being exposed to the Saturnian model back in 1994. I had 40 years of interest in astronomy and knew a fair amount about basic gravitational celestial mechanics. I also had 40 years of loosely accumulated hints that there was something special about Saturn in ancient times. The model didn’t engender a flood of objections in my mind but rather opened the floodgates for feasible answers to huge questions that had been building up about the big picture of the human condition on the earth. I have since believed that the objections could all be overcome with adjustments and more knowledge, and Immanuel Velikovsky, David Talbott, Dwardu Cardona, Wal Thornhill including myself, et al, have consistently supplied such.

I think back to that time and remember that Irving Wolfe tried to talk me out of my acceptance. I remember that Victor Clube wouldn’t talk about it. I remember that Vine Deloria, Charles Ginenthal, Tom van Flandern, Henry Bauer. et al, thought it was a load of crap. These guys all knew too much that wasn’t so.

Back in 2000 CE The province of Lombardy, Italy, was in the mode of hosting at the University of Milano/Bergamo an annual symposium consisting of arcane science and scholarship. The 4 day event was organized by a world class mathematician working at the university who had developed an interest in planetary catastrophism and the Saturnian scenario, and had invited many familiar names, such as Halton Arp, Tom van Flandern, Charles Ginenthal, Victor Clube, Mike Baillie, Robert Schoch, etc., and a bunch of other people with esoteric ideas. He also invited David Talbott to come and lecture, but I went in his place to give the basic Saturnian introductory presentation material.

Mel and Amy Acheson were over there attending with me, and we suffered through 3 days of largely incredibly bad ideas and stupefying material covering a wide range of topics, some of which were philosophical/theological. No one in the audience emitted a peep of protest. Of course, some of it was worthwhile, such as Arp’s findings, but most of it was extreme garbage. On the last day it was my turn up in Bergamo. We gave our presentations that day in a 15th century building and room in the high city section.

In contrast to the three previous days, some in that audience found the material I presented so offensive that they stood up and shouted at the director and excoriated him for exposing them to this level of falsity, and a fight just about broke out. Go figure! These people are living in the “Land of Saturn”, their language is saturated with Saturnian terms, their capitol city was originally called Saturnia, their first and original temple was the temple of Saturn, their major holiday festival is known as "the Saturnalia", and they are immersed in the symbolisms and surrounded by every sort of imaginable connection, yet making real sense out of it all is the very last thing they want.

At the speaker's banquet, Mike Baillie the dendro-chronologist from the British Isles looked at me like I was a detestable insect! Only the geologist Robert Schoch came up to me afterwards and expressed an interest in learning more.

I submit that this is an eye-opening incident that speaks to the intense denial of the human race. Most do NOT want to get in touch with reality, but want to sleep in their ignorance.

Home  Site Sections  Complete Article Map   Contact  Store  Contributions