Site Section Links
Aspects of Jesus
5 Gospels Canon
Misc Ancient Myth Material
1994 Velikovsky Symposium
Book Critiques Links
Misc Biology Links
Poetry & Fun Material
PDF Download Files
Lecture & Video Links
Spiritual Products online store
If it is true that there is Someone in charge of the whole question
of life and death, we can hardly expect to escape a sense of futility and
frustration until we begin to see what He is like and what His purposes are.
- J. B. Phillips, translator of The New Testament in modern English, Your
God is too Small, MacMillan Publishing Co., New York, NY 10022 p. 9.
Some Personal Conclusions?
It is my style or preference to have people draw their
own conclusions before suffering my own, because if they come to
essentially the same, then I have a much greater assurance that my own
reasoning process is sound. Yet, I am comfortable putting down a few of my
thoughts as a kind of summary.
In my wide-ranging canvass of religious thought, I have
never come across anything very close to the vision that I have painted
or implied in this website. Given that the starting point for this thinking
is internal—what I/we intrinsically want and need—it represents a total
rethink of all the issues from a decidedly different starting point. If this
is a legitimate starting point and a legitimate approach, it should come as no great shock to think
that possibly all before us have missed the true vision so far.
Have we not programmed
ourselves to fail to understand the mind or will of God by making it
mystical, transcendent, or alien, beyond our ken? Have we not further conditioned ourselves to
focus on our weakness, our inferior status, our misery, our disempowerment? Have we
not been overly influenced by the consistent message of relentless indifference
from physical reality, suggesting our lack of value? We have overwhelming evidence that even the best of
humanity can be fundamentally wrong, even in most of the scientific or
academic disciplines. Can we not see that the message from God that will
make THE difference has been buried under ancient "scripture" that is NOT the
word of God but merely traditional cultural mythology?
At least one salient point is worthy of note: The composition of this vision is educated by
significant learning in most of the intellectual disciplines or fields, including cosmology, chemistry,
physics, geology, biology, paleontology, archaeology, mythology,
philosophy, psychology, anthropology, linguistic origins and etymology, ancient
history and chronology, etc., and a
life long interest and some formal seminary courses in Christian
theology, and a variety of advanced degrees from the school of hard
knocks. It is restricted and contained by being faithful to proper
philosophical principles and sound science, by being intellectually
responsible. And last but not least it has also been influenced and enlarged by my being a
son, a father, a brother, a close friend and companion, a colleague in a
close group of scientists and scholars, and having been a business partner, husband and lover.
Can Man Be Satisfied?
It is often said that Man can never be satisfied! If
this is so, are we not then either fundamentally flawed in nature beyond any possible
personal fault of our own, and/or is the very fabric of reality not suitable for
us? Without believing either of these positions, cannot we see that the
IF-I-SEEK-US package is a legitimate state of being for the whole of
humanity? Is it not a condition and situation any humane, rational, sane,
and mature person can want and live with and be elated by for all eternity?
Does it not elevate human value and worth, freedom and liberty, autonomy and
sovereignty, and destiny to the highest level possible to conceive?
God Not into Enablement
Is it not conceivable, even arguable, that if the Universe was
originally created for our benefit, then IF-I-SEEK-US IS achievable because it is the intended norm, and it would
be a return to normalcy? Would it not also follow that unfallen
humanity—those that chose to believe in equality—live in and have
never left this state of being, and they are the ones in control?
However compassionate and humane they might be, would they be in the
business of enabling spiritually troubled people to continue to use such
power and intelligence for such perverse purposes as have been done and
demonstrated already by our human family? Consequently
would they impose it upon or share it with us without our spiritual healing?
Would they also violate or override our personal, familial, or global corporate sovereignty?
Unless our volition and will so direct it, would not they be very limited in
what they can ethically do?
It is likely that after the fall of man, presumably an
event long before but leading to the end of the golden age in antiquity
on earth, humanity became
hopelessly lost in a spiritual fog of incorrect and destructive concepts. Is it not
likely this was the factor condemning all
of humanity to our hapless state of tortuous limitation, disempowerment,
and victimhood? A pall was cast upon the whole creation, and the rest of
those in the universe, being aware of what is happening on earth, could
not help but be solemnized and saddened by our tragedies and suffering.
In a world of depravity and confusion, where the disabling
paralyzing noise to signal ratio was increasing and the spiritual
fragmentation of the race was accelerating, help was
needed. Can we not see that Jesus, as the Originator and ordained representative of unfallen humanity, came to
reveal the correct conceptual vision of God and ourselves, and rectify our distorted views?
But humanity has misunderstood and/or ignored his message and amalgamated his pliable words
to the prevailing religious ideology of the time. This was itself
derived from institutionalized mythology as a result of fallen man
anthropomorphizing the ancient planets and their destructive activities
in the Solar system.
The implication is that we are NOT condemned to just age and die, all
the while hoping that within our
lifetime Jesus will come back to save us. Imminent salvation is
proclaimed to be available to those who understand Jesus' words and come into
unity of purpose, values, and paradigm of reality, an understanding of
valid concepts of a God worthy of the term. . According to the promise, once two or
three individuals are able to achieve this, whatever they ask will be
received or accomplished. It would be presumed then that once individuals regain contact
with unfallen humanity and become literal peers once more, such an event would
precipitate a change beyond our incorrect assumptions of what is
currently realistic. Does it make sense that the Universe is waiting for us to regain our senses
and bid farewell to our current horrific state of existence, and that it
is time to eliminate suffering and death at long last?
Two Major Premises
1. The Romantic Beginning of All Things: The
universe was created by the consciousness of a single human entity who
created a fellow being to share an extensive range
of pleasurable and fulfilling experience in a reality that supported
this visionary plan. If we do not arbitrarily and unduly limit the
Originator, we can take our thinking out of the male gender box. Since
it is widely recognized that males are more simple creatures than
females, maybe it is appropriate to think of the Originator as taking on
the female gender role, as, "In the beginning, She decided to do
something risky. She created a man, mated with him, and had children
gods." Is it easier to think that the male mind or psyche envisioned,
designed and created the great dance of romance? Or the female? Is it
more of a forgone conclusion that a created female would mate with a
male originator, or conversely that a perfect male would be enchanted by and mate with a beautiful and
Since all beings at this point in time were equal in
everything that matters, including creativity, another really beautiful
idea is that at some point some creative person exclaimed that they had
an idea to really jazz up this fellowship, sharing, intimacy and
enhancement of life experience and morale. That person advanced the idea
of producing two different genders. Seeing the potential
merits, they would have been keen on this
and would have all contributed to designing the various features of this new
sexual dimension, procreation and the romantic relationship. Once this
was accomplished they all
chose one of the two gender roles. There is really no good reason to
think that the Original One thought up, designed or created everything,
because his nature is to serve and find satisfaction and delight in the
enterprise of his created equals.*
This latter vision highlights the distinction—in a very
important arena—between the traditional concept of the creator as
being the fount of every aspect of reality and we being the passive
recipients of whatever he presents to us versus the vision that we are MEANT
to be, and the unfallen humans ARE, active creative agents that not only
participate in the unfolding of the creation of our reality, but are now in
control of it in the collective known as "The Father". In other words, the
number of creative agents in the universe is, or at least has been growing.
As long as there is perfect unity of purpose, values and paradigm, and
everyone essentially has veto power, the creation can unfold in wonderful
ways that had never entered the mind
of the Originator. He can now not only be delighted with his children
but can be PROUD, PLEASED AND SURPRISED by their accomplishments! Just
like human parents can be when their children live up to their
2. Original Sin as Failure: The fall of our
family was not initiated by any act of disobedience or conscious
violation of God's will, but by NOT doing something. Since you cannot
inject equality into another being without them remaining unequal, equality
can only be offered or extended, not imposed! An equal must be involved with their
own creation as an equal by CHOOSING to be equal in rights and value
amidst an otherwise ocean of inequalities. No two human beings are identical
in any specific dimension or aspect, but we can see ourselves and treat each other
as equals. The Originator and the existing families extended equality to
our family but the original ancestors of our family FAILED to choose to be equal. This
failure festered in the hearts of beings designed to not be inferior,
and led to the downward spiral of separation and degeneration. All the
while, this fallen family was attempting to be superior by creating an
alternate system, one of predatory competition that crossed the lines of
the eternal values. The French have put these this way: Verité, Liberté,
Some other points and perspectives:
Even with my current level of nobility, if I were
the Originator and or any of the unfallen beings, after what
happened to the J person on earth, I would be insulted or turned off by what people
have been thinking and currently think
and teach about "God". Would I not keep my distance until this
demeaning perception is corrected?
I, myself, as one of the good guys would be so insulted
or turned off by such concepts of me and therefore wouldn't have those that
feel that way as friends.
I have consistently tried to interpret all the
information that I have to paint and imply the very best possible picture
of God and reality, of course, using my own human standards, specifications
Never in the discoverable culture of ancient people
before Jesus was there extant a concept of God that was truly
wonderful and inspiring rather than fear inducing, and never was
there a demonstration of such.
As Jesus said late in his life as recorded in Luke,
"When the son of man passes, will he find belief on the earth?
Evidently not!" This very clearly implies that no one at that time
caught the vision of God that he wanted us to have.
It should be clear that Jesus did NOT come to die,
but to communicate with and inspire us to a higher vision of God and
ourselves as children gods.
When this did not happen without his crossing our
volitional sovereignty, only then did he and the "father" set their
course for an ultimate demonstration that involved the crucifixion.
Jesus gave us instructions or directions that are
not always explicit but strongly and clearly implied.
These instructions have never been understood, nor
seen to have any but incidental merit, and consequently the
instructions have never been rigorously followed.
When Jesus said, "I am the way, the truth, and the
light," he was saying that he was the paradigm, the truth that goes
into it, and the inspiration to accept and follow the instructions.
Traditional religions and religious thought have only
precluded and clouded our understanding of God's message to, and
demonstration for, us.
To truly understand, we need to drain the cup and
refill it; or as in the parable to clean out the seven demons and listen to his
truth and not let them come back.
There is no downside or risk to following the
instructions of Jesus, because these consist of seeking the truth,
seeing the revelation of God that he represented, and coming into
unity with some others; unity being very desirable in any account.
The promised outcome of doing so is the delivery of the entire
IF-I-SEEK-US package, the resolution to the human condition, and the
beginning of the re-enchantment of reality back to the way they
designed it to be.
When cosmology and ancient mythology are studied
with a truly open and truth-seeking mind, one will see that ancient
planetary catastrophe undergirds the development of ancient
mythology and ancient planet worship.
One will see that in ancient times, how and why the
planets were anthropomorphized into gods and demigods and promoted
into such prominence.
One will see that our current concepts of God are
mostly derived from these ancient mythologies and their
The life activity and message of Jesus was not one so much as to
correct or upgrade ancient Judaism, but to sweep it away.
Modern Christianity is heavily and hopelessly
contaminated with Zoroastrianism, Judaism, and the constructs of the
Greek mystery religions.
The modern religions are still primarily structured
around variations of ancient Saturn worship replete with most of the
What should be quite disturbing and alarming to
doctrinal complacency is that all of the words translated as god or gods in the
refer primarily to the planet Saturn with a few to the other two planets that
were involved with ravaging Earth, namely Mars and Venus.
The evidence is unequivocal for the bicameral
brain/mind/consciousness in human beings, and an important premise is that in ancient times the race of
humanity had a collective consciousness based upon this foundation of
the second brain/mind.
Before this collective consciousness was disabled or
became largely non-functional, humans had a level of empowerment now
known as paranormal abilities.
We now have only vestiges of these types of
empowerment, and they are little better than parlor tricks, are used
for mundane purposes, and form the basis of plausibility for much
chicanery and fraud.
This ancient collective consciousness was the venue
for perfectly complete telepathic communication, among other aspects
of now-deemed paranormal ability.
We can legitimately speculate/conclude? that the collective
consciousness of the unfallen contingent of human beings in the
universe forms the ultimate base of power, and is that corporate
entity to which Jesus referred as being the "Father".
Three major aspects of the Gospel:
1. The foundation of the Gospel is that the nature, character and values of the Originator are totally and
2. The centerpiece of the Gospel is that we are being offered
imminent immortality and empowerment.
3. The capstone of the Gospel is that we are being offered
equality through supremacy.
Start over or defend the faith?
solution was, in effect, to start again now that the values and
mythologies of the past had been so thoroughly discredited...His
role was simply to see the problem with such tortured clarity that
it could never again be ignored. In his final years he descended
But, for most
thinkers, starting again represented a kind of defeat. It meant
throwing away the whole history of religious insight and truth.
Perhaps the more sober, saner response was to find new ways of
defending the ancient faith.
Bryan Appleyard, Understanding The Present, Anchor Books, 1540 Broadway, New
York, NY. 10036, 1992, p. 79.
The quote above would apply to me if I
had not the understanding that is represented by the material on
Finally, I would recount part of a discussion over lunch with a
colleague and friend. This colleague and I share a common and
essential understanding of the major aspects of a world view, which
includes the Electric Universe cosmology, the Saturnian
Reconstruction of the ancient times, interplanetary electrical
discharge being the major mechanism for most geological formation,
spiritual reality being ordinate to physical reality, linguistic and
symbol development on the earth, etc., and much, much more. After two decades now of talking with him
concerning ultimate issues, arguing
and then discussing, we are moving into more agreement but still
short of unity on some of these. Knowing that both of us are aware
that it borders on arrogance or even megalomania to believe you personally have THE TRUTH
concerning God, knowing that I would take it to be a sincere and legitimate query,
that I had asked myself this question many times, and that I would give
a thoughtful, objective and measured answer, he asked me this question,
“Michael, what is the bottom line that gives you such confidence that
your particular conclusions concerning God and reality are right?”
After thinking and composing my thoughts for a while, my answer was,
“I am going to quote Keats when he said, ‘Beauty is truth,
truth beauty.’ I think that my paradigm and my vision is true because I
have earnestly been seeking the truth for some forty years now, and because my vision of it has
the most sweeping grandeur; the most inspiring beauty; the most
compelling elegance; the most reassuring consistency with all the facts,
information, knowledge and experience that is available to me; it has the best
coherence with my rationality, logic, reason, and romantic nature. It
has the elevation of the humane values to the highest level, the
greatest extent of plausible and defensible answers to the ultimate
issues, and the most resonance with my inner core, with what I am, with
what I want and need; that I can elaborate with word and pen. And it is
grounded neither upon tradition, consensus nor fancy but upon eyewitness accounts
of a historical demonstration.” His reply was, “There is no better
answer than that!”
* The concept contained by the paragraph was advanced, not by the
creator of the site, but by a fellow believer. When I heard it, even
though it didn't agree with my then current thinking, I liked it and