Imminent FulfillmentImmortality,  Safety, Empowerment, Equality, KnowledgeUnity, Society

"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to
  one who is striking at the root."
- Henry David Thoreau
Site Sections, Subject List, Reading Sequence, and Article Synopses

Miscellaneous Articles

Can We Agree on these?
Critical Issues
Unity Agreement Outline
Valid vs feaux intellectuals
Some Atheist Questions
What is a Prophet?
Cult Assessment Criteria
The Brothers Karamazov
Critique of A New Earth
Buddhist Violence
Some Pertinent Parables
Euhemerism & Catastrophe
Ancient Scholastics
Thoughts on Meditation
Kahlil Gibran on Law
The Great Pyramid
Brother? James Ossuary
Model for Visions & Dreams
Modern Echoes-Catastrophe
The Bergamo Experience
In Search of Moses
Personal Experience
Why I'm not Christian
Importance of Catastrophism
Ancient Explosion Reports
How the World Will End
Unity Church Letter
Reactionary Feminism
Lucifer Etymology
Some Conclusions
Pensée Journal Issues
Video-lecture links

...because the Gospel of Thomas has no interest in the Hebrew Bible or the Jewish Messianic expectation. - Richard Bauckham, Jesus and the Eyewitness, Wm B. Erdmans Publishing Co. 2006, p. 237

Why I am NOT a Christian

The best place to start is to look at the very term itself. The concept of a Christ is built right into the word!

The term "Christ" is the Greek word that stands in for the Hebrew Messiah. Now that I know what Jesus is like and what a Messiah is, I find that I don't want nor do I need God to be like a Messiah. I want God to be like Jesus. I NEED God to be like Jesus!

Now that I can frame the life, actions, message and mission of Jesus within the human condition and the ultimate issues rather than the ancient mythology and scriptures, I see clearly that Jesus was NOT a Messiah nor THE Messiah. That is probably a difficult claim for most people to accept until the whole thinking behind the concept of the Messiah is closely examined.

"...Judaism has always preferred the celebration and sanctification
of this life in this world to eschatological promises. My guess
is that 21st-century Christian thought will move back toward its
father and become increasingly Judaized, less focused on death
and the afterlife and more on life here today.."
 - David Gelernter, "The Closing of the Scientific Mind."

Central to the idea of a Messiah is that such a person is a powerful sovereign destined to rule over the people. Granted that a Messiah does great things, restoring law and order, reclaiming the geographical territory, rebuilding the society, etc., these are accomplished through the use of force and the direction of regnal power instead of inspiration and freedom. Messiahs and democracies are actually antithetical to each other.

Here is what the online encyclopedia infogalactic.com has to say:

"The concept of messianism originated in Judaism. According to Jewish tradition, the Jewish Messiah, HaMashiach, "the Messiah", "the anointed one"), often referred to as "King Messiah" (melekh mashiach), is plainly distinct from the concept of a divine Christian Messiah or any other concept of a messiah in other Abrahamic religions, especially the Islamic. The future Jewish Messiah to come is thought to be a human leader, physically descended from the paternal Davidic line through King David and King Solomon. He is thought to accomplish predetermined things in only one future arrival, including the unification of the tribes of Israel, the gathering in of all Jews to Eretz Israel, the rebuilding of the Temple in Jerusalem, the ushering in of a Messianic Age of global universal peace, and the annunciation of the World to Come."

So, it's easy enough for Christianity to dismiss most of this, but once it does, it finds itself in a netherworld without sound bearings. Once you accept that Jesus was not THAT messiah, you have lost the legitimate value of the term "Christ", its cargo, and its implications. The Gospel of John delineates how the Jews pointed out reasons for not accepting Jesus as their Messiah, but clearly does NOT excuse them from accepting him as the son of God. John, one time, has Jesus referring to himself as the Christ, but he may have misremembered where Jesus used the term "coming one". Outside of reporting what other people said, John himself, one time, refers to Jesus as the Christ but may still have been confused over the issue. Although his understanding was superior to all the other disciples except Thomas, it was still not adequate or up to par, and this is an example of where John was not able to completely cleanse himself of his old religious concepts.

It's not just that the word "Christ" is incorporated into the title but that the whole enterprise and thinking of Christianity is saturated with the concept of God the Creator forever being the benevolent dictator and director, rather than the good father of the family who sets the stage for his children to blossom and thrive equality and personal sovereignty. If I tried to direct the life of my son, he would be stunned, and shocked at such a betrayal of our relationship as peers. He would rightfully think I had temporarily lost my spiritual balance, firmly put me in my place, and wonder about the future of our relationship.

The very essence of being a sovereign over other people is contrary to the character of the creator, who actually insists upon primarily taking the role of the servant instead of the Master or Lord. This is what the religious people willfully cannot see, and of course not seeing it is the essence of sin.

Christianity is often known as Judeo-Christianity because of its incorporating as much of Judaism as it can into its doctrinal universe. All the while being in denial that Judaism was ever and always the worship of Saturn as God. Christendom is not open to cleansing itself from this influence and content. Most of the many other errors, wrongs, failings, misunderstandings, and shortcomings of Christendom have been addressed in other places on this site. See Christendom Analyzed, Christendom Challenged, Christendom Condemned.

Given this and its foundation of the Bible being the word of God, Christianity is a religion partly infused with false values. In the western world via the Renaissance, the Reformation, the French Revolution, the founding of America, etc. humanism has become the prevailing philosophy, and Christianity has largely had to become more humanistic. With the exception of those stated and implied by Jesus, The USA Declaration of Independence and Constitution have truer and more legitimate values than those of the two Canon Testaments. Western governments in general hew to a humanistic standard rather than a Christian one.

The person that is in love with the real Jesus, with the unmitigated respect he showed for us as his children, and with the freedom that he opened up for us to reclaim, just does not want to be identified with this package of false religion and its dogma, does not want to be subjected to the vacuous sacraments, rites and liturgy, and can't possibly fit in comfortably with the culture, values and expectations of Christendom any more than with liberal Judaism or Islam. See: Premise Regarding Christianity

By NOT being a Christian, I now miss and lack NOTHING that is genuine EXCEPT numbers of fellow quasi-believers, but I will take quality over quantity in this case.

Home  Site Sections  Complete Article Map   Contact  Store  Contributions