Christendom Analyzed Links
4 Big Questions
God is Dead Movement
John the Baptist Syndrome
20 Doctrinal Questions
What Went Wrong?
Weeping for Lazarus
Religion as a Product
Greying of the Prophets
Site Section Links
Aspects of Jesus
Misc Ancient Myth Material
1994 Velikovsky Symposium
PDF Download Files
Lecture & Video Links
Spiritual Product online store
While the article goes too far in its claims, it is still one of the
strongest attacks on the foundations of Christianity. Bottom line no
matter what; this article does not destroy the authenticity of the
Gospel of John nor the gospel of Thomas and the message of Jesus
Forged Origins of the New Testament
"Never judge the strength of foundation
by size of building." - Thomas Gold
The framework or paradigm of Christendom is one that has been adopted
from Judaism and that has been remodeled by the attempt to fit Jesus
into it. Jesus has been framed by the Old Testament prophets and the
religion of the culture in which he was born and lived. The fact that he
came into this culture does NOT put God's stamp of approval onto it. It
should be abundantly clear that he came to deliver a different paradigm
because his statements about new wine and new cloth that are universally
interpreted in this way. Yet the old wine is preferred, and the old paradigm has been dragged
along. Has not the widespread idolatry of thinking that the Bible is the
word of God reinforced this whole approach?
Some educated modern theologians give a more than tacit admission to the fact
the Christian theology is built on the Apostles rather than on the words
and deeds of Jesus because, even though they pay lip service to Jesus
being the revelation of God, they find it impossible to recover the
historical (real) Jesus, and thus must rely on the record and theology
of the Apostles.
One significant aspect is that the early Christian community was so
ignorant of real, material factors that they long preferred oral
tradition to more responsibly documenting in writing the things that had
transpired. By the time the Gospels were compiled, this tradition had
suffered losses and been significantly corrupted. The door had been
opened for much uncertainty and confusion. Reliable testimony about what
Jesus actually said and did depends almost exclusively upon the Gospels
of John and Thomas being eyewitness accounts.
The one aspect of humanity that Jesus
hypocrisy, which is the
being genuine or authentic.
The traditional Judeo-Christian belief system ought to be challenged,
if not condemned based on these simple verses alone:
- "If you had [real] belief as a grain of mustard seed, you would
say to this mountain, 'move from here to there,' and it will
move; and nothing will be impossible to you." Matthew 17:20,21;
21:21 & Mark 11:23
- "If two of you upon earth agree on everything that matters,
whatsoever you ask, it shall be done by my father in heaven."
- "When the son of man passes on, will he find [real] belief on
the earth? Obviously not!" Luke 18:8
It’s no secret that many young people stop attending church
their college years. In fact, according to a 2014 Lifeway
study, as many as 70 percent of
young adults who
are regular church attenders in high school eventually
out”—and while a small
majority end up returning later in
Daniel Darling, Christianity Today
As for Christianity it can be truly said, never has so much been promised and so little
delivered. Christianity, of course, has a plethora of variations, but
the list is long of the negative things that are generally true.
Christendom commonly or usually:
Actively teaches things that are untrue and evil in that they are
dangerous and superstitious. This is particularly true in matters
Willfully keeps its people in ignorance concerning the evolution of the
Old Testament and New Testament canons.
Willfully keeps its people in ignorance concerning the extent, magnitude
and significance of the difference between the theology of Jesus and
that of the other authors selected to be in the New Testament.
Willfully keeps its people in ignorance concerning the extent,
magnitude and significance of theological differences between the Gospels, and
between the conversational and factual differences in various Gospel accounts.
Willfully keeps its people in ignorance concerning the evolution of its
Violates Jesus' clear instruction against hierarchies and authority
figures by its across the board authoritarian and hierarchal structures.
Commonly and blatantly violates its own teachings, and furiously covers
up its mistakes. There is a long list of fervently held teachings that
have had to be laid to rest.
Produces more martyrs from other belief systems than it suffers.
When faced with unsavory behavior by leaders or members, the sidestep
response usually is "don't look at the church", and the offending priest
or pastors are discreetly relocated.
Indulges in moral and social tyranny in that it arbitrarily tells people
what they can and cannot do on pain of being disfellowshipped,
excommunicated, or shunned.
Fosters hypocrisy, paranoia, ignorance, defeatism, moral weakness, narrow
mindedness, superstition, etc.
Indulges in guilt and fear mongering to keep its “flock” in line.
Indulges in emotional and psychological manipulation to milk its people
set of ridiculous and sometimes horrible doctrines primarily based on
ancient catastrophism and the New Testament book
Has a long history of both teaching and fostering legalism.
Many times has pedestrian, juvenile and petty concepts of morality, purpose
Commonly frontally attacks our significant human dimensions of passion, romance and
sensuality, and rationality, logic and reason.
Is generally willing to politically and socially sacrifice individuals "for the good
of the organization".
Fosters megalomaniacal and arrogant organizations that think they are God's
special formal denominations or sects.
Actively teaches a dark and sinister theology that is based in
misunderstandings from the Old Testament mythology and planet
If left unchecked by more moderate humanitarian forces, produces social,
political and military tyranny backed up by force and violence.
Accepts second, third, and fourth hand accounts of what Jesus said and meant, written by
biased professional writers, as being on a footing equal with or greater
than eyewitness accounts.
Is significantly based on the foolishness of an ignorant, thick-headed
fisherman who never listened closely with understanding or learned a
significant thing from his association with Jesus.
Is based secondarily on a fanatical Pharisee they claim to be a prophet
and spokesman for God whose basis for "conversion" was a private,
unverifiable supernatural visit from Jesus, who was not initially nor
ever completely accepted even by the Disciples, who allied himself with
the existing power structure and put his stamp of approval on their new
rules, who for over 22 years roamed the world proselytizing and arguing
with the Jews in violation of the specific advice of Jesus, who allowed
other people to manipulate him into observing the old sacraments when he
"knew" better, who listened to people give one side of a dispute and
then pronounced judgments without hearing the other side, who took upon
himself the authority to excommunicate a man because of who he was
living with, whose theology is still based on wrong concepts from the
OT, whose concept of righteousness is based on pretension, who became an
apologist for and fostered hierarchal and authoritarian organization,
who had the audacity to suggest that other people emulate him, who could
not get along even with those close to him, who apparently never came into unity
with anyone, and who needlessly died a martyr, cold, alone and
complaining in prison.
Breeds fanatics and cultic leaders with extremely unsavory and unreasonable ideas and interpretations.
Builds some of its doctrines on clearly mistranslated verses in the bible.
Fails to make a clear distinction between revelation and inspiration for its
Fosters denominations that indulge in power politics and resort to legal means
to enforce their ownership and control of congregations and members.
Trivializes the spirit of the last supper service by Jesus by making a
sacrament and holding formal "communion" services periodically to eat a
little wafer and drink a little grape juice or wine, and sometimes meet
down in a classroom to wash each other's clean feet.
Produces somewhat learned theologians who teach side by side with
other theologians in the seminaries, but who are afraid to say and share
what they really think and believe.
Over the centuries vacillates between Adventism and some other eschatological
"Old Testament-based" doctrines on its people that even the writer Paul clearly
Indulges in intellectual tyranny by "protecting" its students and
members from hearing both sides of issues and disputes.
Claims to have superior wisdom for living but does not have a member life-span
or divorce rate significantly different from a comparable socio-economic
Seldom if ever follows the instructions given by Jesus in Matthew
18 regarding the settlement of disputes between members.
Was actively and viciously in competition with Gnosticism, the other
religion spawned by the Jesus incident, and wiped them out with the
sword between 1350 AD and 1400 AD.
Claims that the Bible is the word of God in spite of the fact that the most
authentic book in the Bible (John) denies it.
Fosters sexism, and marriage relationships based on ownership and sexist,
Fosters living and personal interaction based on obligation rather than inspiration.
Adopts the mundane and trivial, materialistic, Judeo concept of the Kingdom of
the heavens refuted by Jesus, and only moves it in space and postpones
it in time.
Teaches that God has a chronological agenda that is more important than His people,
and He is willing to sacrifice them for that agenda.
Has adopted the concept of the ultimate Lord of Light (Jesus) and Lord of darkness
(Satan) dualism from Persian Mazdaism and Zoroastrianism.
Actively teaches concepts about God/reality which are mutually exclusive
and create unbearable psychological tension, such as, infinite grace vs
immutable spiritual law and infinite mercy versus literal eternal punishment
Generally indulges in obfuscation and obscurantism in its doctrines and
explanations by making things mystical and impossible to understand.
Pressures people to make a "decision" or take a “stand” for "Christ",
which is always really a decision for, and a commitment to, that
particular brand of Christianity.
Is guilty of trying to solve universal problems by mundane methods,
problems insoluble by this approach.
Is guilty of producing superficial or misguided definitions for life,
spirit, soul, good and evil, love, freedom, etc.
Is guilty of fostering worship of the "apostles" and their personal ideas.
Is guilty of denying the two clearest and most meaningful aspects of the message of Jesus.
Promulgates the idea that the Bible is inerrant, when even the
most important books for the Bible (Gospels) have significant
irreconcilable differences. See
Is theologically stagnant and is wandering around in a spiritual
Despite the meaning of the Greek word "amartia", that Jesus used
for sin, being missing the mark in concept or understanding,
Christianity instead resolutely teaches that sin is breaking the law
or is a broken relationship.
Despite the parables that teach the Kingship of the heavens
growing exponentially—working like leaven to leaven the whole loaf and
the smallest of all seeds growing into the largest of all plants
sheltering all the creatures—,this has never happened.
Despite the verses in John which says the role of the Holy Spirit
is to teach us all things, and to lead us into all the truth,
Christianity resolutely teaches that we can never realize these ends and
never understand God.
Many times teaches that we are owned by God and are his property to do
with as he likes, including being burned at the stake for his glory!
Fails to make an important distinction between the meaning of the words "god"
Teaches that we are different from God, and focuses on these
differences instead of inspiring us by the sameness.
Defines God as the center of power and control, instead of being
the ideal loving human person, with the ideal character, purpose, values
Fosters the Old Testament "romantic" paradigm—a
touching one but an inadequate one—of God as the male lover and his
"bride" of his special
people versus the humanist paradigm presented by Jesus.