Modern Myth Articles
Importance of Catastrophism
Catastrophism Pioneers
Origin of Modern Geology
Parable about Electromagnetism
Modern Philosophy
Modern Reification
Scientism Religion
The Great Pyramid
Ancient Civilizations
The Modern Mythology
Foreword-Pythagorus' Trousers
Some Science Myths
Einstein Genius Myth
Lecture & Video Links
Velikovsky Biography
Ancient Myth Articles
- General
Science of Comparative Myth
Myth Reconstruction Rules
Avoiding Reductionism
The Importance of Myth
Plausibility of Myth
Reliability of Myth as Witness
Myth as Foundation
The Meaning of Myth
From Myth to Model
Logic of Historical Evidence
Cosmic Symbol Development
Conjunction Themes
Memory of Planetary Upheaval
Natural References of Myth
Myth Memory Patterns
A case for Atlantis
- Specific
Jupiter Worship Beginning
Moon Worship Beginning
Saturn Worship Beginning
The Serpents of Creation
Mercury Mythology
Saturnian
The One Ancient Story
The Golden Age Myth
The Golden Age
Golden Age Interview
The Central Sun
Revolving Crescent on Saturn
The World Mountain
Variations on a Theme
Saturn-Venus Discussion
Miscellaneous
Localizing the Warrior-Hero
Heroes of the Iliad
Sacrifice & Amnesia
Labyrinth & Fortress Themes
Male Gods in Myth
Mars Rocks & Myth
Catastrophism Pioneers
Names of Suns & Planets
The White Crown
A Unified Mythology Theory
The Velikovsky Affair Journals
Thunderbolt
Thunderbolts-Myth & Symbol
The Polar Thunderbolt
Thundergods Celestial Marvels
Thunderbolts of the Gods
Saturn-Jupiter Myth
Introductory Material
Saturn Myth Overview
Ancient Saturn Worship
The Golden Age
The Saturn Myth
The Universal Monarch
Velikovsky Articles
Jupiter Worship Beginning
Moon Worship Beginning
Saturn Worship Beginning
Central Polar Sun
The Central, Polar Sun I
The Central, Polar Sun II
The Central, Polar Sun III
The Central, Polar Sun IV
Saturn Theory Series
The Saturn Theory I
The Saturn Theory II
The Saturn Theory III
The Saturn Theory IV
The Saturn Theory V
Cardona Articles
Saturn Theory Demands
World with One Season-I
World with One Season-II
Saturn Capture Question
Miscellaneous
Reconstruct Saturn Model
Saturn in Genesis
Saturn, Sun of Night
Ultimate Polar Argument
By Jove
Venus-Mars MythThe Star of Dawn
Velikovsky & Catastrophe
The Comet Venus
Velikovsky's Comet-1
Velikovsky's Comet-2
Velikovsky's Comet-3
Velikovsky's Comet-4
Velikovsky's Comet-5
Velikovsky's Comet-6
Velikovsky's Comet-7
Velikovsky's Comet-8
Velikovsky's Comet-9
Velikovsky's Comet-10
Velikovsky's Comet-11
Velikovsky's Comet-12
Velikovsky's Comet-13
Velikovsky's Comet-14
Terrifying Glory of Venus
The Warrior Athena
Introduction Material
Introduction Articles
Word Definitions
Human Condition
Christianity Material
Bible/Canon Issues
Christendom Analyzed
Jesus Material
Jesus' Teachings
Aspects of Jesus
5 Gospels Canon
Philosophy Material
Paradigm Material
Philosophical Issues
Psychological Issues
Sociological Material
Theological Issues
Cosmology, Creation,
Geophysical Material
Cosmology Material
Creation Issues
Geophysical Material
Reconstruction &
Mythology Material
Archeology-Material
Chronology Revision
Language-Development
Misc Ancient Myth Material
Modern
Mythology Material
Psycho-Catastrophe Articles
Saturn-Jupiter Material
Symbol Development
Venus-Mars Material
1994 Velikovsky Symposium
Miscellaneous Material
Book Critiques Links
Misc Biology Links
Misc Issues/Conclusions
Poetry & Fun Material
PDF Download Files
Lecture & Video Links
Spiritual Products online store
|
Catastrophist Pioneers
01/28/2020
"Like the early memory of a single man, so the early memory of the
human race belongs to the student of psychology. Only a
philosophically and historically, but also analytically trained mind
can see in the mythological subjects their true content . . . " -
I. Velikovsky, From AAAS Speech (1974)
There is a long list of scholars who have picked up the scent and followed the trail of ancient
catastrophism and a radically different ancient world than what modern mythology would have us accept.
Isaac de la Peyrère
In 1655, the French lawyer and theologian Isaac de la Peyrère (1596-1676) departed from
Christian consensus with his ‘pre-Adamite’ thesis. Taking a cue from earlier Jewish
discourse, de la Peyrère reasoned that a race of humans had existed long before Adam and the
‘creation of the world’ as narrated in Genesis really concerned only the latest episode in a
continuous cycle of cosmic destruction and creation.
Thomas Burnet
In the 1680s, the English theologian Thomas Burnet (c. 1635? – 1715) argued that the earth’s
rotational axis had originally been perpendicular to the ecliptic plane, producing a
uniform season and climate on earth, until the deluge precipitated the tilting of the axis: ‘…
the Position of the primæval Earth was strait, its Axis being always placed and retained in a
parallel Line to the Axis of the Ecliptick, whence all the Motions of the Heavens were
uniform, and the Course of the Year was pure and unmixed, without Differences of Seasons’.
William Whiston
Between 1696 and 1708, the English polymath William Whiston (1667-1752) proposed that the
earth was originally a comet, which was only transformed into a planet following the impact
of another comet. The deluge transpired when the earth passed through the – supposedly watery –
tail of the same or yet another comet. From classical writings, Whiston further inferred
that the earth’s rotational axis had acquired its tilt on the same occasion and that the year
had originally consisted of only 360 days. A planet in cometary phase, extremely close flybys
of a comet, catastrophic tilting of the earth’s axis and a shorter year were defining
characteristics...
Nicolas Antoine Boulanger
In a work published posthumously in 1766, the French mathematician, linguist and philosopher
Nicolas Antoine Boulanger (1722-1759) submitted that the human mind as a whole suffers from a
deeply-rooted psychological trauma, induced by cosmic catastrophes on a global scale, which
myths and rituals collectively and exclusively commemorate: ‘All cults, hydraulic in origin,
were commemorative rehearsals of the one catastrophe which weighed heavily upon man.’
Giovanni Rinaldo
Giovanni Rinaldo, count of Carli-Rubbi (1720-1795), was an Italian economist and
antiquarian with an impressively versatile mind. Based on a study of ancient sources, Carli – in
his American Letters, composed between 1781 and 1783 – speculated that the earth, prior
to the deluge, completed a smaller orbit around the sun, resulting in a year of 360 days. A
passing comet transformed the former circular shape of the earth’s orbit into an elliptic one,
triggered worldwide floods and conflagrations, caused the ‘extension of the axis of the earth’s
path’ responsible for the current length of the year and resulted in a reversal of the direction
in which the sun is seen to rise or set. Catastrophic consequences of a close encounter
with a comet, an apparent reversal of ‘west’ and ‘east’ and an original year length of 360 days
are all salient aspects...
Johann Gottlieb Radlof
In 1823, the German philologist Johann Gottlieb Radlof (1775-1827/1829) released a slim booklet
containing a set of radical ideas that establish him as the earliest known ‘planetary
catastrophist’. Radlof accepted Olbers’ hypothesis (c. 1802) that the minor planets
Ceres, Pallas, Juno and Vesta recently discovered in the ‘asteroid belt’ between the
orbits of Mars and Jupiter were the remnants of a former giant planet moving in that orbit.
Relying heavily on classical traditions,
Radlof dubbed this planet ‘Phaethon’ and contended that it fell apart within human memory
upon collision with a comet. He further surmised that the planet Venus was one of the remaining
fragments, which embarked on a ‘phase of wandering’, involving a few close encounters
with Mars, before settling into its current orbit.
Due to these turbulent events, the earth’s
rotational axis inclined from its original untilted position with respect to the equatorial
plane: ‘Because of the collisions of the two disturbed cosmic bodies Hesperus and Phaëthon,
but especially because of the former’s change of orbit and the equilibrium ratios of all planets
of our solar realm that were changed entirely as a result, the centre of gravity of our earth
must also have been disrupted and its former position with respect to the pole changed
twice.’ Floods, fires, earthquakes and prolonged darkness ensued as well.
Antoine Bernard Alfred
The French aristocrat Antoine Bernard Alfred, baron d’Espiard de Colonge (1810-), rehearsed
similar ideas in a book published in 1865: a giant planet once existed in the asteroid belt
between Jupiter and Mars; the moon was either captured or formed from a detached portion of
the earth at the dawn of history; and extreme cosmic perturbations attributed to the close
passage of a ‘vast planetary or meteoric body’ thoroughly affected the face of the earth. The
baron emphasised the eye-witness quality of mythical records: ‘… the mythology, I say, is
the history of anything close that took place on the earth itself at a certain time which
chronology cannot exactly determine.’
He also introduced the concept of distinct
chronological ‘ages’ associated with cosmic catastrophe as a new ingredient to the evolving
catastrophist cocktail: the stars were invisible at first, while the sun metamorphosed in the
course of four eras; and all human cultures preserved the memory of a bygone ‘age of the
gods’: ‘The golden age or terrestrial Paradise is anterior to grand events that changed
everything on the earth …’
Ignatius Loyola Donnelly
In bestsellers published in 1882 and 1883, the American politician and amateur scientist
Ignatius Loyola Donnelly (1831-1901) perpetuated the enthralling hypothesis of a comet’s
near-collision with the earth, provoking mayhem in the form of floods, fires, mass extinction
and tectonic changes on a global scale.
Donnelly specifically appealed to the comet’s interruption of the
earth’s rotation as a potential explanation for the prolonged day of
Joshua: ‘Were the heat, the conflagrations, and the
tearing up of the earth’s surface caused by such an arrestment or
partial slowing-up of the earth’s revolution on its axis?
William Comyns Beaumont
William Comyns Beaumont (1873-1956) was an eccentric British journalist and lecturer,
whose aberrant astronomical speculations, published between 1925 and 1932,
find startling counterparts in Velikovsky’s books, which appeared some 2
decades afterwards: many geological features as well as mass extinctions
were due to a cometary collision; cometary tails deposited vermin
as well as hydrocarbons; religion arose from the fear and worship of
comets; Saturn was a former comet responsible for the Biblical deluge;
Venus’ apparent colour, diameter and orbit changed in historical
times; countless deities were identified with planets or commemorated
a cometary dragon; cosmic lightning was of paramount importance;
the year originally lasted 360 days and catastrophes necessitated calendar
revisions; and scholars had erroneously inflated ancient chronology by several
centuries. To top it off, Beaumont had associated his cometary
planet Saturn with a smattering of catastrophic events dated to the 14th
century BCE, linked the intruder to the Greek myth of Phaethon and argued
that it spawned planetary offspring in the form of Jupiter.
Hans Schindler Bellamy
In publications from 1936 to 1959, an obscure, possibly Austrian researcher
using the pseudonym Hans Schindler Bellamy (1901-1982) continued
the theme of myth as the ‘fossil history’ of dramatic environmental
events. Building on Hanns Hörbiger’s theory of moons spiralling into
the sun unless intercepted by planets, Bellamy asserted that human traditions
recorded the disintegration of a former moon as well as the capture of the
present one ‘out of transterrestrial space where, not so very long
ago, it existed as an independent planet’; as a dazzling comet, this
moon interacted with the earth in ways that gave rise to the rich
mythical genres of ‘deluge and dragon-fight, earth-end
and earth-creation, of gods and heroes’.
Alexander Pavlovitch Braghine
In a populist work released in 1938, the American (?) colonel
Alexander Pavlovitch Braghine (1878-1942) extensively mined
mythological traditions in his efforts to reconstruct the cosmic
cataclysms that had apparently occurred in two time frames, at c.
10,000-9,000 BCE and at c. 4,000 BCE. Starting again from Hörbiger’s
moon theory, the thrust of Braghine’s argument was that a giant
cometary interloper – perhaps Halley’s Comet – caused a former moon to
impact onto the earth and the present moon as well as Venus to assume
their current orbits: ‘The irruption of the said giant comet into
the solar system produced the following modifications: Venus
came nearer to the sun and therefore became less visible to us than
before, the Moon was thrown aside, and, entering into the
Earth’s gravitational field, became an earthly satellite, and our old,
small satellite, thrown still nearer to our planet, fell upon its
surface.’ Geological disasters, tilting of the earth’s rotational
axis, a gradual diminution in the amplitude of the axis’
nutation and adjustments to calendars ensued. Seriated epochs of
catastrophe, snaring of the moon and alterations in the rotational
properties of Venus and the earth, with their concomitant calendar
reforms, are all part...
The credit for the above list of documented pioneers:
The info is taken from an article by Rens van der Sluijs at:
http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/2012/07/19/on-the-shoulders-of-suppressed-giants-part-one/
Other early modern era catastrophist scholars and scientists:
Georges Cuvier
Considered by some to be the father of paleontology, Cuvier was a
giant in the study of natural history and in taxonomical classification
of fauna. He fostered many promising ideas such as multiple life form
mass extinctions, catastrophe as being the basic explanation for many
geological developments and formations, comparing anatomies of living
forms with fossils, earth dominated by reptiles in the past, and
creation of new species after major catastrophes.
Elias Loomis
Loomis was appointed professor of mathematics in the Western Reserve
College in Hudson, Ohio. From 1844 to 1860 he held the professorship of
natural philosophy and mathematics in the University of the City of New
York, and in the latter year became professor of natural philosophy in
Yale. The great solar storm of 1859 produced probably the most brilliant
and pervasive auroral displays in modern times, and Loomis
collected and collated accounts of these displays from around the
world, and introduced them to the science community and to the public.
Sir William Huggins (1885) a
English astronomer best known for his pioneering work in astronomical
spectroscopy together with his wife Margaret Lindsay Huggins. He was the
first to take the spectrum of a planetary nebula when he analysed NGC
6543. He was also the first to distinguish between nebulae
and galaxies by showing that some (like the Orion Nebula) had pure
emission spectra characteristic of gas, while others like the Andromeda
Galaxy had the spectral characteristics of stars.
Kristian Birkeland (1913).
He is best remembered as the person whose theories of atmospheric
electric currents elucidated the nature of the Aurora borealis.
Birkeland was nominated for the Nobel Prize seven times.
Kristian Birkeland ultimately did seminal work with his terrella experiment.
Birkeland currents became the focus of a controversy
that continued for over half a century. His theory was disputed and ridiculed at
the time as a fringe theory by mainstream scientists, including the
eminent British geophysicist and mathematician Sydney Chapman. His thinking was notably
championed by the Swedish Nobel prize-winning plasma scientist Hannes Alfvén.
Proof of Birkeland's theory of the aurora and Birkeland currents came in 1967
from U.S. Navy satellite 1963-38C, launched in 1963. The
results were interpreted that they were due to field-aligned Birkeland currents.
He worked with Eyde to build a plasma arc device for the
nitrogen fixation process.
In 1913, Birkeland may have been the first to predict
that plasma was ubiquitous in space. He wrote: "It seems to be a natural
consequence of our points of view to assume that the whole of space is
filled with electrons and flying electric ions of all kinds. We have
assumed that each stellar system in evolutions throws off electric
corpuscles into space. It does not seem unreasonable therefore to think
that the greater part of the material masses in the universe is found,
not in the solar systems or nebulae, but in 'empty' space."
In 1916, Birkeland was probably the first person to
successfully predict that the solar wind behaves as do all charged particles in an
electric field: "From a physical point of view it is most
probable that solar rays are neither exclusively negative
nor positive rays, but of both kinds".
Immanuel Velikovsky is the latest widely-known
planetary catastrophist pioneer to make much of an impression on the world of
establishment academia, and he stood on the shoulders of most if not all
of these predecessors. His reconstruction ideas were much more extensive
in both range of science and sociological disciplines as well as scope
of significance, because they were much more pertinent to understanding
the human condition. As one of the great psycho-analytical philosophers,
Vekikovsky gave the truest, most significant explanation for the
collective psychological disturbance of mankind–surpassing those of
Freud, Jung, Adler, et al., and laid a firmer foundation for
understanding what really happened in the ancient times.
|