IF I SEEK US
Imminent FulfillmentImmortality,  Safety, Empowerment, Equality, KnowledgeUnity, Society

Intelligent, reasonable men of good will SHOULD be able to agree on things that matter.

"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to
  one who is striking at the root."
- Henry David Thoreau
Site Sections, Subject List, Reading Sequence, and Article Synopses

Philosophical Issues

   Building Belief
Building Belief System
The Sound Foundation
Path to the Truth
   Philosophy Aspects
Axiomatic Philosophical Principles
Philosophical Methods
The Philosophical Branches
Modern Philosophy
Meaningful Epistemology
   Important Issues
Evil Just Illusion Issue
Freedom versus Liberty
Fundamental Issues
Games People Play
Intellectual-responsibility
Philosophy of Power
Philosophy of Religion
Physical vs Spiritual Reality
The Ground of Creativity
Life Comes from Life
Life and Ethics
Pre-existence-self-creation
Closing of Scientific Mind
The Issue of Certainty
Sexual Intimacy
Volition Issues
Religious Freedom
Martyrdom
Value of Consistency
Structuralism Rebuttal
Will versus Intellect
   Definitions
Adultery
Fundamental Hypocrisy
Knowledge Categories
Definition of Time
Ethics versus Morality
Philosophies and Terms
Superstition & Myth
   Meaning
Something Meaningful
Meaning and Existentialism
   Miscellaneous
Auguste Comte
Critical Thinking
Nature of Fear
Smug versus Straw Man
Philosopher Schopenhauer
Thought Laws
China & Imago Viva Dei
Interdisciplinary Study

Introduction Material
Introduction Articles
Word Definitions
Human Condition

Christianity Material
Bible/Canon Issues
Christendom Analyzed

Jesus Material
Jesus' Teachings
Aspects of Jesus
5 Gospels Canon

Philosophy Material
Paradigm Material
Philosophical Issues
Psychological Issues
Sociological Material
Theological Issues

Cosmology, Creation,
Geophysical Material

Cosmology Material
Creation Issues
Geophysical Material

Reconstruction &
Mythology Material
Archeology-Material
Chronology Revision
Language-Development
Misc Ancient Myth Material
Modern Mythology Material
Psycho-Catastrophe Articles
Saturn-Jupiter Material
Symbol Development
Venus-Mars Material
1994 Velikovsky Symposium

Miscellaneous Material
Book Critiques Links
Misc Biology Links
Misc Issues/Conclusions
Poetry & Fun Material
PDF Download Files
Lecture & Video Links
Spiritual Products online store

 

...scientists need to be critical and sceptical, and that if you apply science to any field you don't want to prove that your ideas are correct, you want to test whether they are correct.  - Edzard Ernst, Peninsula Medical School

Invalid Argument Terms/Techniques
Updated: 02/20/2020

(some of these terms do not always imply an invalid
technique, but the ploy can be labeled as such)

Ad Antiquitam    Appealing to convention or traditional action as a proof of validity.

Ad hoc    Simply means directed to a single proposition or issue–no further implications intended. A proliferation of ad hoc adjustments to a theory indicates a crisis in acceptability.

Ad hominem (abusive)   Attacking the behavior or character of the man instead of his argument. Appealing to emotions and/or prejudices rather than to intellect or reason.

Ad Novitam    Appealing to modernity or newness as a proof of validity.

Associationism    Implying that an associative relationship is a causative one.

Affirming the Consequent   Within valid logic structure when we say that if A is true then B is true, we must prove A to be true in order to conclude that B is true.  Affirming the consequent is to erroneously conclude that A is true upon finding that B is true.

Authoritarianism    Unquestioning reliance on an authority or expert.

Composition Fallacy   Applying to the whole the properties of the parts.

Defeatism   Claiming an end is impossible to achieve as a reason for not following a line of reason.

De fide    Literally "of faith", but implying revealed by god and requiring unconditional assent.

Denying the Antecedent   Within valid logic structure when we say that if A is true then B is true, we must not assume B to be false because A is false.  Denying the antecedent is to erroneously conclude that B is false upon finding that A is false.

Derision    Using an emphasis on ridicule to assail a premise or argument.

Dis-accreditation    The ploy of pointing out a lack of formal accreditation on the other side.

Disaffirmation    A contradiction or repudiation of a premise formerly stated or agreed upon.

Preemptive Dismissal    Dismissing a premise, hypothesis or theory before hearing the argument.

Dis-qualification      Excusing oneself by the ploy of being formally or academically unqualified.

Division Fallacy   Applying to the part what may be true of the whole.

Dogmatism    Unwarranted or arrogant stating of opinion or position.

Equivocation    Using the same term or word in different and incomparable senses.

Enthusiasm             Originally implying supernatural inspiration, it is often used to try to override logic or evade careful reasoning.

Exaggeration             Overemphasizing to an extreme degree.

False Analogy           An offering of resemblances that don't really imply essential similarity.

Gamblers Fallacy    Thinking that some pattern of the past has an influence on a truly random event.

Genetic Fallacy       The Origin of something is erroneously ascribed.

Ignotum per ignotius    The attempt to defend an assertion against criticism by deriving it from some
   "general  principle" that is even more vulnerable to that criticism.

Illogical   Based on faulty logic.

Invalid Emphasis    Accenting or stressing a word or phrase in a sentence where that accent or emphasis   changes the probably received meaning..

Invalid Syllogism    A syllogism is a major premise, minor premise and valid conclusion such as: All virtues are laudable, kindness is a virtue; therefore kindness is laudable. An invalid form would be: Some Danes are dogs, Lars is a Dane; therefore Lars is a dog.

Irrelevance   Where an argument that may support one conclusion is used to support another, or where the argument is misguided or oblique to the issue at hand.

Hyper-limitation      Intentionally and/or needlessly limiting the number of options or possibilities.

Hypocrisy[*]    Originally meant acting like an actor or a puppet lacking in judgment or lacking the quality of genuine careful and critical thinking.  Now used here to denote an agenda other than to arrive at the truth.

Loaded Questions    Asking questions where no simple response can be reasonable, or where any response implies acceptance of what is asserted as part of the question.

Mala fide    With intent to deceive.

Mal entendu    Misunderstood or poorly conceived.

Mal absurdum     Mis-characterization or invalid reduction to an absurdity.

Misinform    To supply with misleading information.

Non-comparable     Not worthy of comparison.

Non sequitur   Latin for out of sequence, a break in the chain of logic with an unwarranted leap.

Obscurum per obscurius    Any arguement that proves more obscure than what it supposedly clarifies.

Pedantism    A demand to prove the case within the conventional framework.

Petitio principii    Assuming in the premise of an argument the conclusion which is to be substantiated; a form of circular reasoning.

Post Hoc Ergo Prompter Hoc   An argument that implies that since A preceded B in time, A caused B.

Proton Pseudos    First or fundamental falsity or error. Many times arguments start with this up front or as a hidden assumption.

Red Herring   Raising an issue or challenge that is not relevant or is simply a distraction from the issue at hand.

Reductionism   Any method or theory that reduces data, information or processes to seeming equivalents that are less complex or developed than is the actual case.

Reification   The attempt to make a purely abstract idea or concept into a real-world extant entity.

Simplistic Demand   Demanding a simple or inadequate answer to a complex question or issue.

Special Pleading     Using a double-standard to require less rigorous treatment for one's own assertion than one would use against a counter assertion.

Straw man    Arguing against a premise not taken or presented, knocking that premise down, and then assuming or implying that you have then discredited the original premise at question or under consideration.

Tautology   A form of needless repetition or circular reasoning that does not advance understanding.

Ultra-Symbolism    Confusing the symbol with the reality for which it stands.

Unilateralism    Taking into account only one side of an issue or matter.

[*] Most men of good will would say they place the highest priority on knowing the truth, and they would deny being willing to deliberately promulgate falsehood for no higher purpose than to win an argument or to defend status or a personal position. These men would all claim to value the truth over what they really value more. It is in this most fundamental way–men pay lip service to the truth, then let some other agendas override–that we are using the terms hypocritical and hypocrisy.  Any man that is driven to use invalid techniques can be considered to be a hypocrite.

Note: The author of this site is dedicated to being circumspect and honorable in his presentation of material and his arguments for support of positions, and pledges to avoid using these invalid argument techniques.

Home   Site Sections   Article Map   Contact   Store   Contributions   Survey