|
No great advance has ever been made in science, politics,
or religion, without controversy. - Lyman Beecher
Site Evaluation Survey
Updated:
01/03/2020
The site author seeks feedback from readers in the form of constructive
criticism and suggestions to improve the material on the site. The following
list of questions is designed to foster that end. Please copy and paste the
survey below into an email and mark the appropriate box with an "X"
or a number, and
then send the email to the contact URL listed in the footer below.
1. Which would you prefer? (check one)
More (M) or Less/fewer (L) content, (__) articles, (__) links, (__) footnotes,
(__) sections, (__) science, (__) Facts & information
2. Do you appreciate that the site philosophy/rationale is founded upon the IFISEEKUS package?
(__) Yes
(__) D
3. Is the site reasonably well-structured into sections and
categories?
(__) Yes (__) No
(__) Other (specify): ________________________________________
4. Rate the format of the pages (header, footer, LH column of
links)? (__) 0 1 2 3 4 5
5. Did you find the tone of the site? (__) thought-provoking.
(__) dogmatic, (__) inspirational (__) arrogant, (__) too confrontational,
(__) reasonable, (__) radical, (__) angry
6. Did you find the content of the site? (__) helpful, (__)
disturbing, (__) reassuring, (__) informative
7. Do you approve of the site's extensive use of quotations?
(__) Yes (__) No
(__) Other (specify): ________________________________________
8.
Do you approve of the site style's use of article subsection headings?
(__) Yes (__) No
(__) Other (specify): ________________________________________
9. Do you approve the site style of emphasis on questions?
(__) Yes (__) No
(__) Other (specify): ________________________________________
10.
With increasing approval from 0 to 5, please rate the site as to:
Importance/Relevance of concepts and ideas (__) 0 1 2 3 4 5
Personal impact (__) 0 1 2 3 4 5
Clarity (__) 0 1 2 3 4 5
Erudition (__) 0 1 2 3 4 5
Focus (__) 0 1 2 3 4 5
Scope (__) 0 1 2 3 4 5
Validity of, or agreement with, conceptual Content (__) 0 1 2 3 4 5
Validity and accuracy of facts and information (__) 0 1 2 3 4 5
Validity of the level of negative criticism (__) 0 1 2 3 4 5
11. Approximately what percentage of the site have you read? ___%
12. Approximately in what percentage of the concepts were you
interested? ___%
Additional comments or suggestions for improving the
quality of the site?
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
|