IF I SEEK US

Imminent FulfillmentImmortality,  Safety, Empowerment, Equality, KnowledgeUnity, Society

"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to
  one who is striking at the root."
- Henry David Thoreau
Site Sections, Subject List, Reading Sequence, and Article Synopses

Theology Issues Links

   General
What is a God
Basic Questions for Theology
Criteria for Good News
Major Theological Differences
Consistent Theology
Theology ABCs
   Specific Doctrines
Why God not More Involved?
Determinism & Foreknowledge
The Question of Blame
Understanding Forgiveness
Personal Relationship with God
Awareness Level of "God"
The Case for Unity
Destiny of Man
What about Death?
The Gift of Miracles
Who WAS Jesus?
   Sin and Evil
The Problem of Evil
Meaning of Word Sin
The Devil and Satan
   Resurrection
Credibility of the Resurrection
The Issue of Physicality
   Second Coming
Nothing Much for 2000 years?
Traditional Advent
Waiting for Godot
   Belief
The Issues of Belief
Contrast of Believers
   Miscellaneous
Something Meaningful Article
"Take up your cross"
Christianity and Gnosticism
Gospel of Thomas not Gnostic
Meaning of Imminent
Humanism versus Jesus
A Look at Legalism
Spiritual Growth
The Agonizing, Praying Jesus
Rich Young Ruler Account
Gradations of Grace
Empowerment vs Natural Law
Comments on Nicene Creed

Site Section Links

Introduction Material
Introduction Articles
Word Definitions
Human Condition

Christianity Material
Christendom Analyzed
Christendom Challenged
Christendom Condemned
Bible/Canon Issues

Jesus Material
Jesus' Teachings
Aspects of Jesus
5 Gospels of Canon

Philosophy Material
Paradigm Material
Philosophical Issues
Psychological Issues
Theological Issues

Cosmology, Creation,
Geophysical Material
Creation Issues
Geophysical Material
Cosmology Material

Reconstruction &
Mythology Material
Modern Mythology Material
Misc Ancient Myth Material
Saturn-Jupiter Material
Venus-Mars Material
Language-Development
Symbol Development
1994 Velikovsky Symposium
Psycho-Catastrophe Articles
Chronology Revision

Miscellaneous Material
Misc Issues/Conclusions
Poetry & Fun Material
PDF Download Files
Lecture & Video Links
Spiritual Products online store

"Human beings are perhaps never more frightening than when they are
convinced beyond doubt that they are right." - Laurents van der Post

Determinism and Foreknowledge
05/15/2018

An eviscerating doctrine

One of the most pernicious doctrines in Christian theology is the teaching that God knows everything down to the minutest detail that will ever happen in the future, including human decisions and choices. Not only does this idea make a mockery of human will and volition, but it makes a mockery of God by making him the author-initiator of evil and suffering. Down through the centuries it has wasted a lot of theological effort.

If this idea were true, I would ask, "What is the point of creation?" I would suggest that God should die of boredom because there is only one possible movie, and he has seen it already. What kind of life would it be if you could never be surprised or delighted?

Of course this ideasometimes called "predestination", "double predestination", "determinism", or "extreme Calvinism"—was spawned in Christianity by statements in the Bible such that god "knows the end from the beginning", and that he is "the Alpha and the Omega". Setting aside the challenge that the Bible is NOT the word of god, to interpret even these statements this way is extreme and is little short of perverse or moronic. These scriptural phrases do NOT imply this doctrine! The Bible itself does NOT overall foster or teach this extreme thinking, and that can be readily ascertained.

A few of many Biblical examples

For example, in Genesis, God says, "I repent that I made man." You have Abraham with Isaac on the altar, where God says, "...NOW I know that you love God." In Kings he says, "I repent that I made Saul king", indicating that things did not turn out the way he hoped they would. Not only was the predictive prophecy of Jonah aborted, but to Daniel the angel Gabriel says, "I have come because of your words. The Prince of Persia has withstood me these twenty one days."  All this and other scenarios imply that according to the Bible the future is conditional. It teaches that God doesn't always know what will happen and works in limited ways—he will not ever override our choice/volition—to accomplish certain other things and objectives.

Of course the point is moot for those that don't accept the Bible as infallible or as the word of God. That leaves us even more free to use logic and reason, and to realize that Jesus doesn't put his stamp of approval on this sweeping and disturbing concept. He was shocked and troubled by the spiritual dullness and perversity of the disciples. At the end of his ministry he asked a rhetorical question, "When the son of man goes, will he find true belief on the earth? Evidently not!" His prophecies were mostly about his own situation and what HE would do in the near future and the final end-point of the resolution, something that God is determined to hold out for, something He believes is going to happen one way or another no matter how long it is going to take.

His prophecy concerning the destruction of Jerusalem was a prediction that any astute and knowledgeable political and/or military analyst of the times could have made. And let us remember that the Gospels were compiled after these things took place, opening up the possibility that prophetic words were put into Jesus' mouth, or that his words were slanted or embellished into more specific predictions. We can be certain that Jesus made no prophecies that would prove or demonstrate deterministic foreknowledge.

Even so, a majority of Christians take the positions both that God knows exactly what will happen in the future and that he constantly meddles with human affairs. When in discussion situations and presented with the many sound arguments, including Bible passages that can be raised against these positions, the "true believers" invariably take refuge in mysticism—"Who can know thy way, thy ways are past understanding"; or they claim with some undisguised disdain, "Oh, but you are just using HUMAN logic." This latter is my favorite objection, because I then get to ask, "What kind of logic are you using, that you can pull rank on me?"

Set in the proper context and properly understood, what Jesus said never violated logic nor reason, and was intended to be understood except in the couple of cases where he wanted to obfuscate in order to avoid trouble from the crowds. In the light of the above, can we not see that the totally-and-only-human Jesus paradigm again not only makes the most sense but is the most consonant with good news?

Home  Site Sections  Complete Article Map   Contact  Store  Contributions