IF-I-SEEK-US
Imminent Fulfillment, Immortality, Safety, Empowerment, Equality, Knowledge, Unity, Society

"There are a thousand hacking at the branches
of evil to one who is striking at the root." -
Henry David Thoreau
Site Sections, Suggested Reading Sequence, and Article Synopses List

Theology Issues Links
   General Doctrines
What is a God
Basic Questions for Theology
Criteria for Good News
Major Theological Differences
Consistent Theology
Theology ABCs
   Specific Doctrines
Why God not More Involved?
Determinism & Foreknowledge
The Question of Blame
Personal Relationship with God
Awareness Level of "God"
The Case for Unity
Destiny of Man
What about Death?
The Gift of Miracles
   Sin and Evil
The Problem of Evil
Meaning of Word Sin
The Devil and Satan
   Resurrection
Credibility of the Resurrection
The Issue of Physicality
   Second Coming
Nothing Much for 2000 years?
Traditional Advent
Waiting for Godot
   Belief
The Problem of Belief
How Gospels use term"Belief"
Contrast of Believers
   Miscellaneous
Something Meaningful Article
"Take up your cross"
Christianity and Gnosticism
Gospel of Thomas not Gnostic
Meaning of Imminent
Humanism versus Jesus
A Look at Legalism
The Agonizing, Praying Jesus
Rich Young Ruler Account
Gradations of Grace
Empowerment vs Natural Law
Comments on Nicene Creed

Site Section Links

Introduction Material
Introduction Articles
Word Definitions
Human Condition

Christianity Material
Christendom Analyzed
Christendom Challenged
Christendom Condemned
Bible/Canon Issues

Jesus Material
Jesus' Teachings
Aspects of Jesus

Philosophy Material
Paradigm Material
Philosophical Issues
Psychological Issues
Theological Issues

Cosmology, Creation,
Geophysical Material
Creation Issues
Geophysical Material
Cosmology Material

Reconstruction &
Mythology Material
Modern Mythology Material
Misc Ancient Myth Material
Saturn-Jupiter Material
Venus-Mars Material
Language-Development
Symbol Development
1994 Velikovsky Symposium
Psycho-Catastrophe Articles
Chronology Revision

Miscellaneous Material
Misc Issues/Conclusions
PDF Download Files
Lecture & Video Links
Spiritual Products online store

Definition: Evil is that which diminishes, interferes with
or threatens the sustenance and enhancement of life.

The Argument of Evil Against God
01/04/2018

There have been a lot of arguments that the existence of God and the existence of evil are incompatible, and many arguments that attempt to reconcile the two. One solution that has been proposed is that evil doesn't exist. All of this is very shallow, since the arguments take place within the arena of the traditional paradigm of god, and wherein an adequate definition of evil is not even provided.

To me, denying evil is to be FUNDAMENTALLY in denial! So, let's deal with the argument that evil does not exist, that it is only an illusion. It seems to be difficult to dismiss all evil as illusory because, if it appears to me that I am racked with disease but that appearance is merely illusory, then it is nevertheless a painful and troubling illusion. Even if the disease is not evil because it does not exist, the appearance and experience of the disease remains an evil. Objective suffering may, perhaps, coherently be dismissed as illusory, but subjective suffering cannot be. So then, if evil does not exist, the illusion of evil still exists and is just as bad.

If the illusion of evil is just as bad as the real thing, what's the difference? Well, the difference may be significant! If evil is real, in and outside of myself, then that is a multi-faceted concern that would involve others. But if it is just a personal illusion, then all I have to do is get rid of the illusion within myself. Sounds simple and straightforward since others need not be involved. However, what can I say except that I pity you if you think that evil is just your own personal illusion!

Not only does this site offer a Jesus-based paradigm of god, but it accepts that real evil is afoot in our world and raises the question as to who gets to define it and who is to blame for it. Who else but you and I should do this?

When people that I talk to happen to object to something or bemoan some really bad stuff like, say, child molestation, I often ask, "What's wrong with that?" When the shock wears off and they realize I am asking a philosophical question, they respond with answers like, "It hurts the children!" They are then further shocked when my response is,  "So, what's wrong with that?", and they offer further answers, always to be met with the same response,  "What's wrong with that?" After some iterations and prompting they begin to realize that they did not design reality, weren't even there when it happened, and have no legitimate basis for saying anything much more than, "I don't like it!" or "It demoralizes ME!"

And so we come to the ultimate and only definition of evil that can be valid. A personal one that is choice based. Every other definition presupposes something that we cannot proclaim with absolute certainty. The development of philosophy and theology must be personalized because we have a personal stake in the game, namely the sustenance and enhancement of OUR lives. Evil is that to which we are intrinsically and constitutionally opposed, that which is less than ideal, that is life detracting, that which we cannot ultimately ever like or agree with.

Far more promising than the dismissal of evil as illusory is the Augustinian and Thomist view that it is nothing more than a privation of good or goodness. According to this view, evil is not a positive thing that is out there in the world, but merely an absence of goodness. God therefore cannot be blamed for bringing evil into existence; evil is not a thing and so was not brought into existence. The idea that the world contains evil (i.e. certain privations of good) can thus be reconciled with the idea that it was not created by a God who would create evil; it is only the good in the world that was created, the bad is merely an absence of good.

Even if this account of evil were accepted, however, it would not completely resolve the problem of evil. For it may still be asked why God neglected to create those good things that are needed and found to be lacking in the world. Why doesn't the Creator fill the vacuum? Even if evil is simply an absence of good things, there is a tension between this absence of goodness and the existence of a Creator that knows how to, is able to, and wants to create all needed good things. No, evil is the opposite of good or goodness.

Another argument is the apologetic one: Since everything needs a contrast to be experienced as real, evil is necessary to make good good! However, if this be true—and it is not—it simply defends evil itself as necessary and thereby good.

All of the above definitions and descriptions fall woefully short of being satisfactory. The problem of evil, then, in some form at least persists, and we need to come to an understanding of what it is and is not, and how it came to be.

Home  Site Sections  Complete Article Map   Contact  Store  Contributions